top of page

Bolstering Deferential Standards of Review and Circuit Precedent: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Felon in Possession of a Firearm Conviction, Sentencing Guidelines, and Forfeiture Order

  • Jun 10
  • 1 min read

United States v. Stone

By Mary Elaine Mitchell


In United States v. Stone, the Eleventh Circuit addressed three issues that resulted from a felon in possession conviction that reinforced their reliance on deferential standards of review. Specifically, the Eleventh Circuit addressed the constitutionality of a felon-in-possession statute, Sentencing Guidelines, and forfeiture proceedings. While the defendant alleged the district court’s felon-in-possession conviction was unconstitutional and the resulting forfeiture order and enhanced sentencing was in error, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court. The Eleventh Circuit specifically found the applicable felon-inpossession statute was constitutional as applied to the defendant, and it found the district court did not err in enhancing the defendant’s sentence while also imposing a forfeiture order.



 
 
 

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
Vol. 7 Publications:
Olivia R. Lee, Lange v. Houston County, 7 Cumb. L. Rev. Online 1 (2025).

Evan B. Isbill, Huggins v. School District of Manatee County, 7 Cumb. L. Rev. Online 7 (2025).

H. Reed Wagoner, EBSCO Indus., Inc. v. Ballard, 7 Cumb. L. Rev. Online 12 (2025).  


Parker W. Smitherman, Callens v. Episcopal Found. of Jefferson Cnty., 7 Cumb. L. Rev. Online 17 (2025). 
bottom of page